Had I been alone I could have knelt there for hours. (Life, Vol.I, p.81). for private distribution only. He produced the Vulgate (used as a major source by W&H, and Tischendorf before them). I,II. But the publication of the Scofield Bible resurrected the old Jesuit futurism with a Zionist twist.Today the policies of our country are dramatically influenced by futurism and Christian Zionism while few have even heard of historicism. The layout resembles the 1901 edition of the American Standard Version. I have shown in many articles that W&H, Tischendorf and others stand condemned by their own hearts, words and work. A. Hort (1881) was used as the basis for translating the New Testament into English. A French priest, Richard Simon (1638-1712), was the first who subjected the general questions concerning the Bible to a treatment which was at once comprehensive in scope and scientific in method. Same goes for any other letter. Modern Bible versions, based on a few low-quality, and even corrupt, Bible manuscripts. It is briefly this, that in an early time some doctrine is proposed in a simple or obscure form, or even but darkly hinted at, which in succeeding ages,as the wants of mens minds grow, grows with them in fact, that Christianity is always progressive in its principles and doctrines (Life, Vol.I, p.78). The New World Translation uses the name Jehovah 6,979 times in the Old Testament. They called the Textus Receptus 'vile' and refused to believe that God preserved His holy words. And when we learn that the NIV was worked on by homosexuals, we see not just corruption in modern versions, but a pit of damnation that no genuine believer can touch. Helvidius, the devout scholar of northern Italy (400 A.D.), who had the pure manuscripts, accused Jerome of using corrupt manuscripts on this text. You well know with what folds it entwines us and with what fangs it gnaws us.(The Jesuits in History, Hector Macpherson, Ozark Book Publishers, 1997, Appendix 1). The answer to the two Oxford professors was this: The Church of England must accept the Council of Trent. Please Westcott and Hort: Translator's Beliefs From the beginning, Newman saw the value of using the university, where the clergy were trained for service, as the basis of his attempted takeover of the denomination. http://www.christiandoctrine.com/christian-doctrine/the-bible/1202-jesuits-others-and-new-bible-versions, Looking for news worthy topics, in both the Politcal, Social, and The Religious arenas. Also bear in mind that Rome never claims to be Christian as such, but prefers to be called by its title, Roman Catholicism. June 4th Westcott to Lightfoot: Ought we not to have a conference before the first meeting for Revision? The old Italic version, into rude Low Latin of the second century, held its own as long as Latin continued to be the language of the people. That was my first introduction to B. F. Westcott (1825-1901) and F. J. May 17th the Revised Version is published in England, selling two million copies within four days. It is also why, in our modern day, homosexuals want to get rid of the KJAV. Ukrainian Drone Attack on Crimea Preparation for Counteroffensive': Russian fears for peninsula mount after Zelensky said he would try to retake it and preparations are 'almost complete'. Amen., (3) AMERICAN REVISED VERSION OF 1901:And bring us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one.. A Little History: Cyrus I Scofield and the Tribulation Origen became head of this school (of which he had began as a student). [When other early church fathers (bishops) were condemning Origen, Eusebius praised him in his book ecclesiastic history. 1862 Apr. The beginnings of the revision of the King James Version occurred at Oxford University during that period, known as the Oxford Movement, which began in 1833. Ordinary believers dared not oppose them because of their biblical knowledge but opposing heresy is not just about knowledge of verses and words, it is about having the Lord within and expressing faith. They all, with other modern Bibles not mentioned, represent a family largely built on the Revised Greek New Testament, or one greatly similar, or were the products of a common influence. In Britain, a different approach was taken by men who also chose to think themselves smarter than Gods Word. Here was his clear acknowledgement of what most scholars already knew: thousands of manuscripts from different countries in different ages, said the SAME thing! (1) KING JAMES BIBLE OF 1611. "[135], The Evangelical German Bible Society reviewed the German-language edition of 1986 and described the NWT as a "translation that is accurate in many respects, but tendentious in the sense of the special teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses". (Baron von Tischendorf, quoted in John E Remsberg, The Christ, p. 272). [88] In 1985, Alan Stewart Duthie responded to the assertion by Fee & Stuart that the NWT is "filled with the heretical doctrines of this cult",[89] stating that although "there are some heretical doctrines to be found [it] does not reach even 0.1% of the whole, which is very far from 'full'". Hort and Wescott and the Scofield Bible - Historicist.com The The Two Paths Of New Testament Manuscripts - End Time Deceptions Hort and Westcott were committed Communists. The people just rejected them. Milton was a name of horror.(J.A. Additional works consulted in preparing the New World Translation include the Armenian Version, Coptic Versions, the Latin Vulgate, Sistine and Clementine Revised Latin Texts, Textus Receptus, the Johann Jakob Griesbach's Greek text, the Emphatic Diaglott, and various papyri.[50]. If he be condemned, what will become of me? (Life, Vol.I,p.94). But lets give a explanation of who Westcott and Hort were, then go into Wescott's and Hort's Greek translation of the Bible and how Hort and Westcott persuaded scholars of the Revision Committee to switch to the corrupted Alexandrian text for the new version they were working on. 20th Hort: I think I mentioned to you before Campbells book on the Atonement, which is invaluable as far as it goes; but unluckily he knows nothing except Protestant theology (Life, Vol.I, p.322). One need only read the letters between these two "gentlemen" to see their thoroughly black-hearted correspondence and intent to confuse and change God's Word. Newmans future was now clear to him. The foundation of our faith is the truth of Gods Word.(pbministries.org), In Antioch (Syria); where the followers of Christ were first called Christians, the true believers were making exact copies of the original manuscripts. What a heinous mix of good and bad! The fact is that the Westcott-Hort text represents the first widely-accepted departure from the Received Text in the post-Reformation era, and the modern English versions descend directly from the W-H text. In 1984, a Reference edition of the New World Translation was released in addition to a revision of the regular volume. May 4th Hort to Lightfoot: I am also glad that you take the same provisional ground as to infallibility that I do. (Life, Vol.I, p.424). On this, Canon Cook says, Yet this enormous omission rests on the sole authority of and B.(2) (That is, on the Vatican Manuscript and the one found in 1859 in a Catholic monastery.) Does this mean W&H were acting on behalf of Rome? Chapter 8: Westcott and Hort - Samuel C. Gipp Th.D. Based on this reasoning, the translators consider to have "restored the divine name", though it is not present in any extant manuscripts.[63][64]. Newman declared that the principles of Roman Catholicism could be taught in the Church of England under the Thirty-Nine Articles. The following quote is by Hort: Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and Letters of Fenton John Hort, New York, 1896, Vol 1, p81. Others made further atheistic contributions; and, then, Julius Wellhausen (1844-1918) put it all together in a unified theory of multiple authors of the Pentateuch, over several centuries. It is almost laughable that many who use these corrupt modern versions also oppose Rome in their speech! I have already shown that W&H were Romanists. Sadly, the average churchgoer doesn't realize it, and worst, the one's that have been warned don't care enough to Please research the evidence. [91], George D. Chryssides stated in 2019 that the unfavourable criticisms by Harold Henry Rowley, Julius R. Mantey and William Barclay "were extremely vague", but that Bruce M. Metzger "mentioned a few specific passages which he believed were wrongly translated. And, whatever the truth may be, this seems just the liberty required at the present moment, if any living belief is to survive in the land. (Life, Vol.I, p.454). This higher-critical approach did much to destroy the historically held views concerning the authorship of the Biblical books. In 184 to 254 he corrupted Bible manuscripts. [19] Additionally, over the centuries since the King James Version was produced, more copies of earlier manuscripts of the original texts in the Hebrew and Greek languages have become available. There is some hope that alternative readings might find a place in the margin. (Life, Vol.I, p.390). Far Eastern Bible College | Articles in Defence of VPP In 1841, he wrote this to a Roman Catholic: Only through the English Church can you act upon the English nation., (J.H. [76] NWT editions have since become available in several additional Braille scripts. When I gave the school my researched information on certain claims made in the course, I was politely dismissed. He had enough proof from these to show that Jerome used corrupt manuscripts the same as were used by W&H and all later new version authors! New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures - Wikipedia As I have suggested elsewhere, the monks wanted to burn the supposed Sinaiticus because it was such a bad manuscript! The majority, then, did not bother with Romes Vulgate. 4, p. 492). "[112], Frederick E. Mayer wrote in 1954: "It is a version that lends support to denial of doctrines which the Christian churches consider basic, such as the co-equality of Jesus Christ with the Father, the personhood of the Holy Spirit, and the survival of the human person after physical death. . Westcott and myself have for above seventeen years been preparing a Greek text of the New Testament.